Showing posts with label Comics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comics. Show all posts

Friday, October 5, 2012

The Jesse Lonergan Interview!




Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson and @HideousEnergy David @dc_hopkins and @SuperCuteComic, and Brent Hibbard @BrentHibbard

Interview:

• Interview - Cartoonist Jesse Lonergan joins us for the companion interview to our 100th episode. We met Jesse at Small Press Expo 2012, and immediately fell in love with his art (and him, dawww).

Jesse is currently in the middle of his Dancer a Day Tumblr, where he draws a different character in the midst of that most human of emotions, dance. Swing over to his blog for more art, like that crazy battle royale picture up there, as well as some free comics! We got the opportunity to read All Star #1, a mini-comic that will eventually be incorporated into a graphic novel. From what we've read it looks to be a touching tale of friendship and family, with touches of comedy and baseball action; just like life, yo. Thanks to our sponsors DCBS for supporting the show, and making it possible for us to go to SPX and thus meet Jesse. Everybody sing: THE CIRCLE OF LIFE, AND IT MOVES US ALL.

Go check out Jesse's stuff. You won't regret it.

We also do a webcomic with Brent Hibbard, called Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Wednesday, September 19, 2012

#099 - The SPX 2012 Show!



Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson, David @SuperCuteComic, and Brent Hibbard @BrentHibbard

Episode #99:

• Intro - Bethesda, Maryland welcomes us to Small Press Expo 2012! Road show baby! Thank you DCBS for making it possible.
• Small Press Expo 2012 - We went there. We handed out minicomics. We talk about that, and all the awesome people we met, including a Hideous Energy listener we drove 9 hours to meet! HOLY SHIT.
• Untitled Mail Segment - We read your emails and listen to your calls. Email us at hideousenergy@gmail.com and call us at 1-720-HIDEOUS.
• Outro - Suicide ghosts? We're dead. But we always loved you.

Please go check out the final entry to the Tate/Williams Fucktastrophe of '98 over on Super Cute. We are so proud of it.

Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Wednesday, September 12, 2012

#098 - Show Me the Booty




Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson, David @SuperCuteComic, and Brent Hibbard @BrentHibbard

Episode #98:

• Intro - We're imperfect clones of each other, but we kiss the same. DCBS is nice, because they are paying us to be this way.
• Topic Thunder - Greg Capullo wants the booty (maybe), Davie Sim joins Fall Out Boy, and the writers of DC's New 52 are writing fan fiction? Say wha?
• Read 'Em and Weep - Hawkeye #2 by Matt Fraction and David Aja; Stumptown Vol. 2 #1 by Greg Rucka and Matt Southworth; and Ultimate Spider-Man #14 by Brian Michael Bendis and David Marquez.
• Remember the Hyphens - We completely forget that Elektra and Black Cat show up in Volume 8 of Ultimate Spider-Man: Cats and Kings.
• Outro - Call us; there's no maybe about it. CALL US - 1-720-HIDEOUS.

Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Wednesday, August 29, 2012

#096 - Hobidooby Herb




Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson, David @SuperCuteComic, and Brent Hibbard @BrentHibbard

Episode #96:

• Intro - DCBS and why Christian fiction sucks. Seriously.
• Topic Thunder - Rob Liefeld...ughhhhh.
• Remember the Hyphens - Hobidooby! It's time to check out volume 6 of Ultimate Spider-Man: Venom.

Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Wednesday, August 15, 2012

#095 - Charlie Whitney's War



Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson, David @SuperCuteComic, and Brent Hibbard @BrentHibbard

Episode #95:

• Intro - Charlie Whitney...we salute you.
• Remember the Hyphens - Austin cries and is a giant baby because of Ultimate Spider-Man Volume 4: Public Scrutiny.
• Read 'Em and Weep - Spider-Men #4 by Brian Michael Bendis and Sara Pichelli; Godzilla: Half Century War #1 by James Stokoe; Space Punisher #2 by Frank Tieri and Mark Texeira; Revival #2 by Tim Seeley and Mike Norton; Batman #12 by Scott Snyder and James Tynion IV and Becky Cloonan and Andy Clarke
• Mail Dem Bags - We answer listener questions from our boy Charlie
• Outro - Rest in peace Joe Kubert, you were an amazing artist!


Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Thursday, August 9, 2012

#094 - A Dying Alert




Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson, David @SuperCuteComic, and Brent Hibbard @BrentHibbard

Episode #94:

• Intro - Tiaras on dudes? Gender roles. Unbreakable skin.
• Remember the Hyphens - After the slight letdown that was volume 3, we find a lot to love in Ultimate Spider-Man Volume 4: Legacy.
• Read 'Em and Weep - Ultimate Spider-Man #13 by Brian Michael Bendis and David Marquez; Hawkeye #1 by Matt Fraction and David Aja.


Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Wednesday, July 25, 2012

#093 - I Ab Gossam's Rickety



Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson

Episode #93:

• Intro - Wrestling and fakeness? Surely you jest.
• Topic Thunder - The Dark Knight Rises. Our review.
• Remember the Hyphens - Gwen Stacy, Doctor Octopus, and not really a whole lot else. Our review of Ultimate Spider-Man Volume 3: Double Trouble.
• Outro - Demons and birthing. Gross.


Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Wednesday, July 18, 2012

#092 - Wreckin' Space



Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson

Episode #92:

• Intro - Celebration! Indiana Jones...shoo boy.
• Topic Thunder - San Diego Comic Con, minus the sweating and balls smell, although that's there in spirit.
• Read 'Em and Weep - Space Punisher #1 by Frank Tieri and Mark Texeira; Spider-Men #3 by Brian Michael Bendis and Sara Pichelli; and Punk Rock Jesus #1 by Sean Murphy.
• Remember the Hyphens - Peter takes on the Kingpin and teenage feelings in Volume 2 of Ultimate Spider-Man: Learning Curve.
• Outro - We are us, and know no other way.


Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Thursday, July 5, 2012

#090 - Spank Dat Ass Spider-Man




Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard. Follow Austin on Twitter @austinRwilson

Episode #90:

• Intro - Fan fiction? Slash fiction? You need to know what's what.
• Topic Thunder - Marvel Now! is not worthy of that exclamation point.
• The Amazing Spider-Man movie review! SPOILERS.
• You Should Read This - Cross Game by Mitsuru Adachi and Planetary by Warren Ellis and John Cassady.
• Outro - New slogans that will live in pimpfany.


Go check out our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute (supercutecomic.com). Download more Hideous Energy episodes through iTunes or Fanoff.com.


Wednesday, April 4, 2012

#078 - Stargate Brain-Hair



Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard.

Episode #78:
• Intro - We're sorry. And more Discount Comic Book Services madness. But fear not, Andy Kirby from Marvel 616 Politics is here!
• Topic Thunder - Godzilla: Explosion War
• You Should Read This - Austin picks "Notes For a War Story" by Gipi; David picks "Powers" by Brian Michael Bendis and Michael Avon Oeming; Andy picks Dark Wolverine: Daken #23 by Rob Williams.
• Top 5 Conspiracy Theories We Just Made Up Ourselves

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

#072 - Close Your Eyes When We Kiss Your Lips




Visit Hideous Energy at the following places:
Twitter - Tumblr - Facebook - hideousenergy@gmail.com - Fan Off.com
Also check out our webcomic Super Cute with artist Brent Hibbard.

Episode #72:
• Intro - We give you help locating that love and feeling, discuss Discount Comic Book Services, and some random movie David asks about.
• Read 'Em and Weep - 'Lil Depressed Boy #9 by S. Stephen Struble (yes, we said his name wrong a lot) and Sina Grace; Batman #6 by Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo; and Star Wars: Dawn of the Jedi: Force Storm #1 by John Ostrander and Jan Duursema.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Tale of Sand Stuns Visually, Skimps On Story



My earliest memories of muppets are wrapped up in the movie Labyrinth, the TV show Fraggle Rock, and obviously, actual "Muppet properties" like The Muppets Take Manhattan, The Great Muppet Caper, A Muppet Christmas Carol, and The Muppet Babies. This statement is noteworthy for a couple of reasons, but chiefly it deals with how I frame my interaction with this piece/these pieces of popular culture. Notice I did not say, "My earliest memories of Jim Henson," similarly to how I would never say, "My earliest memories of George Lucas...". The properties themselves are what I interact(ed) with, and although now I am much more aware of a creator or creators than when I was younger, I still go into a book, movie, play, or anything presenting a fictional narrative with the hope that I can place myself inside its created world and experience it as seamlessly as possible. Jim Henson is without a doubt one of the most important visionary creators of the 20th century, and if you debate that I would ask you why. His creations still exist to this day, and often bridge the gap for many fans between various age ranges. Henson managed to bring something into the world that boys and girls could enjoy, and made it possible to carry the enjoyment and entertainment with them as the calendar pages fluttered by and their age-appropriate nouns changed. Passing down a beloved movie (or book, or song, etc.) to one's children is surely a fantastically rewarding aspect of parenthood (I can only speculate), and Henson, along with his collaborators, gave the world a huge amount of material that can function in this way.

I never would have described myself as a huge Henson fan, but sitting down to write this I realized exactly how much of my young life (as well as young-adult, and now adult) has been spent appreciating the art of Jim Henson. Labyrinth was an enormous part of my childhood, and a large role in the development of my imagination and love of escaping into stories - which the movie deals with explicitly - and realizing this led me to see how much I really owe to Henson. I graduated from watching Labyrinth on a VHS prone to storms of static to enjoying it on a pristine Bluray.

My lifelong interaction with certain Henson properties was taken into consideration when Archaia Entertainment announced they would be putting out a comic based on an un-published/un-produced screenplay by Jim Henson and Jerry Juhl entitled Tale of Sand. The announcement came with images from Ramon K. Perez that were absolutely gorgeous, and immediately set the excitement and anticipation levels high. Maybe, at my current age, the eventual enjoyment levels I experience with a book are intimately tied to my previous levels of anticipation/expectation. That equation is something I've dissected and worried over for a few years now, and realistically there is most likely nothing I can do if it's true. I hate to think the actual strength of the material has less to do with my enjoyment than my own personal expectations do, and that is one of the reasons why I refuse to admit there is truth to the theory "It's all about expectations."

When I finally got to read Tale of Sand I went into it looking for adventure, comedy, and maybe just a pinch of introspection powered by the book's own characters learning about themselves. What I found was a collection of absolutely gorgeous images by Ramon K. Perez, with colors provided by he and Ian Herring that lingered in my mind. Also of note is the lettering, which was based on Jim Henson's handwriting.

This book has some of the most memorable art published by Archaia to date. The art plays a large role in how noteworthy the publication has become, and is much more worthy of the positive critical outpouring than the script provided by Henson and Juhl. The words "un-published" and "un-produced" become particularly glaring when Tale of Sand is actually read, rather than just looked at. The prospect of creating a comic based on content from a beloved source that was previously unseen (or even completely unknown) may have saddled this project with unfair critical expectations, and may have made it hard for some reviewers to look with anything other than nostalgic eyes. I absolutely love Henson, but this book delivers 50% of a complete project; its art is gorgeous, its story is all but non-existent.

Maybe the problem with the Tale of Sand story lies in its existence as an un-produced screenplay that had been in the Henson vault for years. Information on the Tale of Sand publication gives a couple of indications of what was to be expected from taking this un-produced script and adapting it. The back of the book states, "It was during the development of the final draft of the screenplay that Jim Henson came involved in the production of Sesame Street and The Muppet Show, and he left the experimental filmmaking of his youth behind to concentrate on the creations that would in time make him a household name." We're given two possible reasons for why the story and/or a plot is missing from Tale of Sand. First, Henson was unable to finish a final draft of the script before moving on to other projects. There's absolutely no evidence to support the theory that Henson left the script unfinished because he was unhappy with it, but that is certainly a possibility. It is undoubtable that Henson's commitment to Sesame Street and The Muppet Show occupied much of his time, but I wonder if Tale of Sand being shelved for almost 40 years didn't indicate Henson's displeasure with the material he and Juhl had created. We'll most likely never know that answer.

Another indication that Tale of Sand was going to be light on story is the book's jacket copy referring to Henson's leaving the "experimental filmmaking of his youth." Karen Falk - the Archives Director and historian of the Jim Henson Company - addresses Henson's experimental work in her foreword to Tale of Sand, specifically an Oscar nominated short film he created entitled "Time Piece." You can see the short film on YouTube here, and I suggest if you're going to read Tale of Sand, you would do well to watch this short film first. It gives you a pretty good hint at what you're going to experience with the book, and might put your mind in the right place going into the material.

I disagree with anyone labeling Henson as a strictly visual storyteller, and that is why I was so disappointed to find very little story in Tale of Sand. Yes, the visuals of Henson's many creations are strong and memorable, but the best of his creations has always relied on story and character to some degree, tales that evoke, as I mentioned earlier, some level of introspection in the viewer, whether it be through comedy or drama.

Tale of Sand is undoubtedly an experiment in visuals, one that succeeds immensely. Where it fails, however, is to deliver a story alongside those visuals, which is a significant failure for a hardcover of 152 pages which will cost you $29.95. If you're content to buy a book that is beautiful to look at, and nothing else, then this book is definitely for you. I think if I had known just how experimental it would be (again, I direct you to the short film Time Piece), my interaction with Tale of Sand would most likely have been different. It's odd to think that even though I have spent a large amount of my youth, adolescence, and adulthood with Henson's creations, I was absolutely unaware of the short film he almost won an Oscar for. I can't help but wonder if this piece of Henson's past should have stayed in the vault, if for no other reason than maybe that is in fact where he intended it to stay. Although the foreword contains references to many attempts to find financing for the film, all resulting in failures, it is entirely possible the script's status as un-produced was because it was in reality just an extended version of Henson's one minute and 37 second short film, which is utterly without story and entirely reliant upon experimental visuals.

I am pleased I got the opportunity to read this publication for without it I wouldn't have seen Ramon K. Perez's gorgeous art, and been able to put his name on my list of artists to watch. Another thing of note is how reliable Archaia is at producing quality publications, from paper stock to binding. A book published by them is almost guaranteed to look wonderful on your shelf. Tale of Sand hasn't altered my love of Henson, but it definitely has put my love for his creations in perspective, and in a way, strengthened that love.

Archaia is currently developing a Labyrinth graphic novel with artist Brian Froud (who helped design the characters for the original film). I will undoubtedly be reading it.

-Austin Wilson

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

#062 - The World's Best Cooking Podcast


Today we foster gender confusion, discuss comics for somewhere around an hour, then spoil an unreleased movie! Yeah! Check out  our webcomic with Brent Hibbard, Super Cute. Twitter is constantly alight with our musings. Emailing us through hideousenergy@gmail.com is an easy way to get yourself mentioned on the show.  Facebook has both us and Super Cute. Fanoff never gives up on us. Tumblr loves us. Comic Booked has us and other podcasts! Check out our exclusive content over on Why Not Indie? You can download MP3s of us from Fan Off and also through iTunes!
Episode #062:
• Intro -  Ohhh yeah, fostering gender confusion and discussing deals from Discount Comic Book Services!
• Topic Thunder - Marvel's next big event garners a TON of conversation; Bendis leaves "Avengers;" Alan Moore is mean again; and Dark Horse brings digital comics to you and some people thought that was bad.
• The Flicker Shows - David spoils an entire movie that hasn't even been released yet. Seriously. He read the entire script, and then spoils the whole thing.
• Outro - Seeeeee yaaaa'...byyyyeeee...

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Paying Too Much Attention: Doing It Yourself

There are a lot of ideas out there. People are thinking all the time, and it isn't always about whether their jeans are too saggy in the butt, or if their breath smells, or if maybe one eye is slightly bigger (or slightly squintier) than the other. Those are very real concerns, yes, and mostly because these Smell Factories called bodies carry our minds around all day and night. Eventually we learn to curb these worries, and think about something outside of ourselves, something Other. When that happens the possibilities are only limited by where we're willing to let our heads go.

My head has continually gone toward the land of fiction for a while now. It's a great big universe where anything can happen, and usually does. I could cut this up into little finer slices of existence, but seriously, it is just so huge that I would be putting too fine a point on it. Fiction allows us to describe our lives (individual or collective) by talking about ANYTHING.

Fiction isn't constrained to prose, and realistically it isn't even confined within the realm of the written word. I certainly don't think that all fiction is art, but that's the great thing, isn't it? The subjective nature of art allows all of us to see something different in whatever form we're enjoying; or hating, consuming, watching, reading, just pick a verb and enter it here and you are taking part in the freaking amazing world of art.

I'm not trying to figure out what is or isn't art. There is no definitive answer there, at least not one that isn't completely colored by opinion. What I'm thinking about is the idea I mentioned earlier, at the beginning of all this: the astronomical amount of ideas and the amount of people having them. Not everyone is concerned with fiction, though, so that original number (which really only exists as a symbol) can be decreased. Now we're dealing with a more manageable amount of thinkers. Still though, everyone who has thoughts about fiction does not have the desire to create more, so again, we can subtract. It's a smaller amount gone, however, because if you are a reader - specifically of comic books - the chances are somewhat high you'll want to create what you enjoy. I would never say the comic book world is filled with people aching to create the art they love, more so than any other artistic field, but it probably wouldn't be too hard to convince me.

I read comics. I want to make comics. More specifically, write them. I've been working at it for a while now, and the amount of people (fellow comic readers) I've met who have ideas for comics is large. If looked at one way, this means the odds of becoming a comic book writer (or artist, inker, letterer, editor, etc.) are constantly shifting, steadily closing in to suffocate. Another way to look at it is that with more ideas comes more yearning for creation. So if cut up into two very rigid categories, we're dealing with either being disheartened or inspired.

Those aren't the only two options, obviously. One of them is incredibly negative, and the other can easily come off as arrogant or pretentious. It's possible to avoid falling into these traps (I think doctors call them emotions), and go after what you want regardless of the bullshit known as "the odds." No one can stop you from making comics. People can hurt you, but they can help you too, and the latter is hard to remember occasionally. One place that made me realize I haven't tried hard enough to make comics was Kickstarter. It's an amazing place, a freaking portal of inspiration. I found a comic project on there which clicked my head-gears over into a configuration where the thought of "I'm going to do this" wasn't so hard to come by. I didn't decide to start a Kickstarter project, but I did decide that putting together a small comic is something I'm completely capable of, and immensely passionate about.

Even if I'm not getting paid to do it, I feel like I have to make comics. I replace all my worries about whether my jeans are the right shade of denim for my outfit with thoughts about comics. If I'm not making a comic of some kind, then I'm wasting my time. So I'm going to put together a comic, and document the process on here.  Maybe no one will see it, maybe I'll show it to everyone because I took something out of my head and made it into something. It might suck. It might be mediocre. It might even be good. But it will definitely be.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Go Straight To Jail - Do Not Pass Go...


In 2010 an American man was arrested for crossing into Canada with what was deemed child pornography by Canadian Customs. You can read more about this, and specifically my opinions by reading the editorial I wrote on Comic Booked.com.

After writing the article, and during the process of its editing, I saw the possibility to publish some information that I didn't include in the original article, specifically quotations from CBLDF Executive Director Charles Brownstein.

In an interview with Robot 6, Brownstein made statements I think sum up the American man's legal troubles perfectly, and places them squarely within the realm of uncertainty.

Brownstein said, "We protect the First Amendment rights of the comics art form. Sometimes that means coming out against bad laws that almost everyone agrees are bad laws, and sometimes that means fighting for important free speech principles by protecting unpopular speech.  Protecting free expression is messy work.  Often protecting the principles of free expression means defending material that makes one personally uncomfortable.  That discomfort is a small price to pay for maintaining a culture of free expression."

It certainly doesn't make it any easier for my own struggle, which I detail further on Comic Booked, as for whether comics depicting underage characters in sexual situations should be considered child pornography or not. My distaste for the material aside, the legal ramifications and classifications are interesting to me, so Brownstein's quote hit home.

An article in the Ottawa Citizen directly addressed the Canadian Constitution, but made much more bold statements than I feel comfortable making. The article, which is posted without a byline, states, "There’s no point in having a right to free speech if we make exceptions for everything that people find distasteful or offensive. We must make an exception, though, when expression causes real harm — such as pornography that uses children as models for photographs or videos. That’s a horrible crime, and even the possession of such material must be treated as a serious offence."

It then goes further, saying, "But Canada’s current law goes beyond pornography that causes harm to children. It also makes some works of the imagination — stories and drawings — illegal if they depict people under the age of 18 in sexual situations. Many classic works of art might meet that definition, and the law does allow for a defence on the grounds of artistic merit. This puts the courts in the bizarre position of determining what is a work of art. Citizens cannot hope to know in advance what the law really forbids, and whether the judge will share their opinion of what is art. Policing the way you express yourself on a piece of paper or on your laptop comes awfully close to policing your thoughts."

One of the most interesting parts within the Ottawa Citizen article is their reference to "classic works," as well as art that is deemed to have "merit." Upon reading this my mind immediately snapped to Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita, and Alan Moore and Melinda Gebbie's Lost Girls. The Moore and Gebbie work may be much more appropriate for this discussion, as it concerns comics. It certainly met with criticism for portraying young characters in sexual situations, but I am unaware if it has ever been deemed child pornography, and will even go so far as to say it hasn't. If it had, would it still be available for purchase?

During my email correspondence with Brandon Graham I asked about comics containing material that clearly goes too far. Specifically, I said, "When you said, 'I don't think it's possible to do anything really harmful with drawings of fictional characters,' does that include all forms of pornographic comics?" This question was related to Graham's mention of controversial comic creator Mike Diana. Graham referred to Diana by saying, "One thing that surprised me about [this case] is you hear that someone has got in trouble for a comic and you immediately assume it's some Mike Diana level cannibal feces dog child sex thing..."

Answering my question about comics which contain material that goes too far, Graham said, "I certainly don't want to read the worst that can be drawn but I can't think of a good reason to not allow it to be drawn."

I find all of this extremely interesting. Please go check out my article on Comic Booked, and feel free to comment, whatever your opinion.

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Time To Make the Manga - How To Do It Right


Some of us geeks (nerds, whatever) are busy worrying about whether we've "won" or not, and what that means sociologically. It might be a relevant question, but it deals with navel-gazing so blatantly that it becomes unsettling, and I would rather read the books and think about them than what it means for comics to be so visible and relevant now. It would undoubtedly lead to me wondering if comics are in fact that mainstream, but no thanks.

One of the best things to come out of the Harry Potter and Twilight (and arguably other) crazes is the focus on Young-Adult fiction, and how reading is seen as fun and worthwhile by a whole new generation of brains that are attached to eyes. Creating younger readers is the first step to creating older readers, which is one step in a huge process of trying to create better thinkers/feelers (or how about "emotionalators"). There are definitely downsides to the onslaught of YA fiction though: an adherence to derivative plots and characters, unimaginative design sense, writing with your agent overlooking the screenplay already-in-progress, and on and on. Focusing on the positive is such a happy thing to do, however, so let's be happy together.

Maybe YA fiction isn't making a "resurgence." It is definitely a genre that has been around for ages and ages, albeit perhaps in a different form than it inhabits now, and Laura Ingalls Wilder would most likely agree. Even her works weren't immune from adaptation, although it took quite a few years before they made it to the glorious Land of Landon. There is one difference between this age's YA fiction and the fiction of yesteryear: the inevitable and potentially lucrative road toward adaptation. It's a road that may or may not lead to its intended destination. Plenty of books go through the adaptation process only to end up in a cul-de-sac, a sad little dead end that people use to turn around when they're lost. The road has existed for a while though, only now people and properties travel down it much faster, with the speed limit increasing year after year.

Now adaptation doesn't just mean TV or film, but comic books as well. No one was surprised when "Twilight" was adapted into a best-selling Manga. Some people also weren't surprised that it was considered to be below average, which is putting it nicely. This same surprise is applicable to "Harry Potter," and how there are no comics of that insanely popular property. Those two parties of surprised people aside, novels making the leap to comics/graphic novels are starting to look not only more like a trend, but like one piece of the media puzzle.

Rick Riordan's "The Lightning Thief (Percy Jackson and the Olympians)" was not only adapted into a movie, but a graphic novel as well. Although the movie did horribly, most likely spelling doom for any sequels, the graphic novel sold well enough that other books in the series will see adaptation as well.  This might be the new blueprint for YA novels (or potentially any genre novel); write book, adapt into movie and comic book simultaneously, cross fingers.

Now another series of YA novels is making its leap to comics, with an eye toward the movie screen as well, this time Scott Westerfeld's "Uglies" series. The first book has been adapted into a Manga where Westerfeld will outline the story, with larger writing duties falling to Devin Grayson, and Steven Cumming illustrating. This isn't just another tale of a YA novel trudging down that slow and difficult road toward adaptation though, this is the tale of how someone is thinking differently. Not only that, but thinking about this process from a perspective you love to see, but are often afraid you won't. Scott Westerfeld is thinking about the adaptation of his novels creatively, with an eye toward character.

Yes, his first novel in the series, "Uglies" is in development as a film, and it could be oh so easy to see the adaptation of that same book into Manga form as a quick cash grab, spiced up with a little bit of marketing ploy. That's not what this is though, at least not from where I'm sitting.

Westerfeld announced in San Diego, at Comic Con International, that the Manga adaptation of "Uglies" (slated for publication in May 2012 from Del Ray) will in fact be following the story of Shay, a secondary character featured in the novel as a friend of the main character, Tally.

Rather than offering up an exact adaptation of the novel so many fans have already read, Westerfeld chose to expand on the world he created, and delve into other characters and their stories. Although, yeah, this will definitely work as a marketing technique, that doesn't seem to be foremost in the minds of the creators involved.

I've read all but one of the "Uglies" series, and was a huge fan of all of them. Seeing this news, I kind of groaned, and wondered why exactly I would want to read a comic book adaptation of a book I had already read. Certainly this is a personal preference, but in my case it's one that just doesn't make sense. Having read the book, I had already pictured the characters and their world as I wanted them to look, so why worry about reading/looking at someone else's interpretation? This leads to the obvious question of why then go see a movie adapted from a book, and my answer for that is: actually moving pictures are different than mentally moving.

I love the idea of taking the adaptation process/opportunity in order to expand a fictional reality. It does lead to the question of whether the word adaptation even applies, but I'm not worried about that. I'm worried about being told great stories. Now, knowing what will be in store for me with the "Uglies" Manga, I'm worried that the adaptations of the future won't be as interesting.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

More Thoughts On DC

Whatever your opinion of the whole DC re-launch/digital news is, you have to admit, they're making sure people are taking note. Whether or not the new readers are already lining up, I'm not sure. That's one thing I'm interested in knowing that I probably won't: what new advertising methods/venues are DC utilizing to hook these new readers? Publishing books with updated or redesigned characters only goes so far; the readers have to know what/where/who, and all those other Ws the journalism teachers make you chant at them like Druids. Without the details, this would remain a mystery. Already DC has taken care of a small portion of the mystery, releasing the creative teams behind ten of the 52 books that will see relaunch in September. They're not all noteworthy, but some of them did catch my eye.

 



















The new Wonder Woman title will feature writing by Brian Azzarello, and art by Cliff Chiang. The art would be enough to hook me alone (and David), but adding Azzarello into the mix is just enough of a sweetener to make me more curious about the character than I have been in a long time. I've read some fantastic work by Azzarello - and some I've not cared for - and I've pretty much always loved what Chiang has drawn, so right away, DC is making a good choice with this one.

The book I'm most interested in is The Fury of Firestorm. The description on the DC blog reads as follows, "Welcome to a major new vision of the Nuclear Man as writers Ethan Van Sciver and Gail Simone team up with artist Yildiray Cinar to deliver THE FURY OF FIRESTORM #1. Jason Rusch and Ronnie Raymond are two high school students, worlds apart – and now they’re drawn into a conspiracy of super science that bonds them forever in a way they can’t explain or control. The cover to issue #1 is by Ethan Van Sciver." I'm interested because so far this is one of the descriptions released that shows how much re-imagining they could possibly be doing with these characters. As of now the rest of the titles seem to be basically along the lines of what readers and fans already know, although to be fair, not a lot of information has been released, so really who the hell knows?

One thing David and I could've discussed further - maybe - on episode #036 is the anger that fans could possess at their characters being changed (or destroyed, depending on how angry they already are). It's a very valid point, and one I'm somewhat surprised isn't more alive in myself. The possibility that the stories I've read about these characters could be classified as void or irrelevant puts the New Vs. Old Readers situation into a whole new perspective. What isn't happening inside my head, though, is the debate about whether I will be reading DC still or not. As more information comes forth, and I start to see a clearer picture of what these books will entail and contain, I'll start making decisions about whether I need to bother with them. Maybe I've changed. I'm not AS worried that they'll be taking away years and years of history and continuity; I'm worried that I won't be entertained. That's my biggest concern.

•Austin

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Permanent Nerd



Here's a video of Austin getting marked for life. David is behind the camera. The tattoo is the key from the Escapist's chest, the character created by Michael Chabon for his novel, "The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay." Later on the character starred in Brian K. Vaughan's story, "The Escapists," and even filled the pages of some small anthologies. Austin clearly loves the character. Or just wanted to make a really bad decision. Here it is, fresh from the gun into his skin. Please note his goofy smile.



Friday, February 11, 2011

Hob and Me

The comics landscape has changed a bit over the years, with the focus going from single issues to collections. Even that's changed somewhat, with a heightened amount of attention paid to original graphic novels. I'll skip the debate and discussion about the definition of these terms, but I want you all to know that I am absolutely gritting my teeth and fighting this urge.


Because my brain has developed the way it is, I am obsessed with lists; making them, reading them, maintaining them after I have made them. At any one time my phone has at least two or three lists on it. Two of these are similar, or exact copies of lists on my iPod, which are also on my computer. I am pretty sure this all stems from my childhood, when I would buy action figures, particularly Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. Every figure came with at least 1,900 accessories, usually weapons. There was no physical way for the Turtle or whatever other weird animal/warrior ninja to hold any more than one of these weapons at a time. This messed me up pretty badly.

Years later, I use those jagged memories and end up creating Top 5 lists nearly every week. One of those lists has almost nearly been "Our Top 5 Favorite Favorite Single Issues." Actually, I'm not entirely sure we never did that one. Even so, the constant and obsessive list making has led me to think about my favorite single issues of comic books on more than one occasion. Here I am again, doing this.

- • -

Neil Gaiman wrote 75 issues of Sandman. All of these issues contain enough awesome shit to put you into a sweet coma. There are two Sandman issues I love enough to read over and over, and one of them (maybe both) makes my list of All Time Favorite Single Issues. The name of the issue which is definitely on the list is "Men of Good Fortune," and it was the thirteenth issue Gaiman wrote. Yeah, he wrote 62 issues after he wrote the issue that I would carry around with me always, if this were possible without making me wonder how far away I am from just building a house out of the shit I like.

The issue deals with Morpheus, the Lord of Dreams, meeting a man named Hob Gadling in a bar in the year 1389. Gadling is an outspoken guy, maybe not specifically because he's drunk, but certainly that amplifies the trait. He tells his drinking buddies that he's not going to die, simply by refusing to do so. He says death is a "mug's game." Morpheus overhears Hob saying these things, and he happens to have his sister, Death, with him. Being members of the Endless - a family of ethereal beings whose powers border on the limitless, and also all have names beginning with Ds - someone making such an outrageous claim along the lines of "I'll never die, just 'cause I don't want to" turns into something much more.

Gadling is granted immortality for as long as he desires it. It's kind of surprising Desire, Dream's androgynous sister-brother never shows up, because this story sort of deals with that concept as well. What Gaiman does do with the story, however, is much more entertaining than having another member of the Endless appear to send ripples through the mortals' - or soon to be immortal - lives. At this point in the series we had only seen Dream and Death, and Gaiman was still feeling out who these characters were, and who they were going to become. He's stated in several interviews, as well as introductions and afterwords to the Absolute Sandman editions, that he didn't exactly have a defined story in mind, at least regarding the span of the 75 issues that ended up being written.

The most interesting aspect of the "Men of Good Fortune" issue is how surprising it ends up being. Before this issue there were tales of revenge, some bloody, some psychologically jarring/scarring, and all of them delivered from the hands of Morpheus to those who had betrayed him or greedily used his artifacts for their own personal gain. Issue six was titled "24 Hours," and it covered that amount of time inside a diner. Over those 24 hours Doctor Destiny used Morpheus' dream amulet to torture the customers in every way you can freaking imagine, eventually capping the whole festival off with some grisly murders. So yeah, when this Hob Gadling dude tells his friends that he isn't going to die because he refuses to, it isn't too hard for the reader to envision some Clive Barker-esque torture scenario where the guy ends up living forever, but has to literally puke his stomach lining up every time someone talks to him, or some nutty shit like that.

There's no way for me to know if Gaiman planned to use previous story lines and their themes or plots to nudge readers into a crazy teeth-counting serial killer mindset. No one's asked him this yet, that I know of, and I probably won't be the guy to do it; sometimes I describe Neil Gaiman as "British as shit," so I might not be the first choice to ask the guy anything. I don't mean it pejoratively. I guess I just mean he has a really awesome accent. My adoration comes out in strange forms, occasionally.

What happens is partially obvious. Hob Gadling is granted immortality, yeah, and the reader most likely knew that was coming. The next part was a surprise, however. Morpheus says that he will meet Gadling in that bar in 100 years, and if he still wishes to live, then they'll take off for another hundred and do it all over again. If he wishes to die, however, then that wish will get the okay too. About that time, when Morpheus dropped that bit of information on our boy Hob, I could hear the chains rattling and the fires roaring.

They meet, they talk, they generally just sort of hang out. We see them both go through various clothing styles, Gadling taking on different careers that fit into the changing world around him. Through it all he never says he wants to die, even when he's having a shitty time of things and the endless life he's been given is dragging his ass through the dirt.

The thing that makes this comic one of my favorite single issues ever is the ending. It isn't a surprise/twist, not in the widely accepted sense of these things, but it definitely surprised me. I would hate to spoil it for someone, so maybe this is all pointless or incomplete. I know for me, when I read this issue, it changed not only how I thought about the Sandman series, but about the character of Morpheus in particular. I was reading the next issue with a fresh set of eyes, and that is always an accomplishment for any writer.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Comic Twart Continues To Be Awesome

If you've never checked out the Comic Twart, you should go do so now. It is a continual parade of interesting and amazing art, and should be a regular stop on your daily internet wanderings. Recently I saw this picture, by Evan Shaner, and it reminded me why I love comics. Check it out.




This is only one of the awesome entries by the Comic Twart artists doing their interpretations of the Ghostbusters. Francesco Francavilla has a great, clickable piece to look at as well, so check that one out too. Comics rule.